You are currently browsing the tag archive for the ‘Normal Retirement Age’ tag.
A recent post by the CRR shows that non-working Baby Boomers age 55 to 61 (ages ineligible for Social Security benefits) are wealthier now than non-working 55 to 61 year olds of the past. The post explores how they’ve accumulated the wealth and why they chose to leave the labor force. An important point of the article is that, though they find themselves wealthier than non-workers of the past, they still only have a median wealth figure of $98,000. This “isn’t a lot of money for a boomer with a long spell of retirement ahead of them. Boomers who leave the labor force often put themselves at risk of depleting their 401(k) assets too soon.”
Full post from the Center for Retirement Research.
Post Introduction: “Baby boomers who’ve left the labor force in their pre-retirement years are in better financial shape than they once were.
The wealth of non-working Americans between ages 55 and 61 increased from $83,000 in 1992 to $98,000 in 2008, according to new research from the Urban Institute in Washington. (Comparisons are in constant dollars.)
Potential explanations for this trend range from greater U.S. inequality that launched more boomers into the top wealth tier to a rise in the numbers of married men who don’t work – but have wives who do. Barbara Butrica, a senior research associate at the Urban Institute, said her study did not look into the “why” for the emerging group of voluntary non-workers who are approaching traditional retirement ages, married and single men in particular. One possibility, she said, is that “they are leaving the labor force because they can afford to.”
…Read the full story.
During my study of retirement income security something has always bugged me. Countless articles and reports suggest smart asset allocations are the tried and true way to have a successful retirement (and still say this even after the economic recession). They talk about the value of investing and give financial advice that is clearly geared toward those with ample resources. Advice for the little guys is rarely provided, though arguably they need it more. Most people try to save for retirement but end up with little financial wealth. They’ll probably spend at least some of their retirement struggling financially.
A recent article by the Center for Retirement Research explores ways individuals can leverage their savings and assets so they are more likely to have a secure retirement. They suggest financial planning should not only include building retirement portfolios but:
- Delaying retirement and taking more time to contribute to retirement accounts
- Controlling spending and using the money saved to increase your savings
- Investing assets in ‘riskless equities’ after retirement
- Taking out a reverse mortgage
In other words, when all your financial adviser tells you is which stocks and bonds to put your money into, they are missing the big picture. There is an array of tools that people should explore and, based on their situation, employ to help them build a secure retirement. In fact, asset allocation was found to have the smallest effect on retirement security. The paper found working six months longer produces the same outcome as moving all investments into ‘riskless equities.’
However, I’d like to bring it back to my original point: do we provide advice to those who need it most? Recently, I gave a talk on women’s retirement security to a local Council on Aging community event. Community members had wonderful questions after the talk. One question struck me most: “I didn’t know about saving when I was young, my husband did that. But we spent most of it on his illness and now he’s gone. I have nothing but my Social Security check, do you have any financial advice for me?” Later we had a chat and I asked her some questions about her situation. I found that she had been a homemaker, she did not own her home, and she was physically incapable of working. Her monthly check was also ‘too much’ for her to qualify for government services and benefits. What advice do we have for people like her?
Researchers and financial experts are starting to explore ways low- and middle-income workers can make the most out of their savings and assets. But still, there are people currently in retirement who live on little income, own next to nothing, and would love some advice. This is particularly true of older women. Many never needed to care about their finances until their husband passed away. If anyone knows an organization or service that advises these people (for free!) please educate me…because I don’t know of one.
Many older workers would like to retire slowly, decreasing their hours at work before completely retiring. With the current economic downturn, people are expressing interest in working longer. People have a lot of their identity wrapped up in their careers, so reducing your hours can be a smoother transition both psychologically and financially. But is this option available to everyone? The Boston College Center for Retirement Research answered this question in a report titled Phased Retirement: Problems and Prospect.
Phased retirement is a white-collar phenomenon and high income individuals who are White, wealthy and educated are more likely to be able to reduce their hours with their employer. Interestingly, 73% of employers interviewed said they would ‘work out’ a phased retirement plan for certain managerial or higher level employees. These informal policies dominate over formal procedures with older workers being kept on to train colleagues or new staff. Unfortunately, not all workers are given the same options.
Employers point to a variety of constraints that make it difficult for them to provide phased retirement options. Pension plans or paying health insurance for older part-time workers is a frequently named drawback. Employers also express interest in only keeping certain employees. In fact, phased options are often offered to the best or favored employees allowing the employer to weed out undesirable workers. Still, one of the main reasons a company did not have phased retirement was simply because their business did not want or need part-time work.
The good news is that phased retirement options continue to increase among companies. If you are interested in phased retirement talk to your employer. Many different arrangements can be made to accommodate both the worker and the company. Here are some tips:
- Double check – does your employer already have a phased retirement program in place?
- Determine your needs – what do you want and what options are realistically available to you?
- Pension impacts – does your plan provide for phased retirement? how could it impact your benefits?
- Health insurance – what will happen to your health benefits if you reduce your hours?
- When can I start – does your employer have policies that could affect your decision? (for example: 6 months after you retire you can come back and work part-time)
- Employer expectations – what will be expected of you and how will your role and responsibilities change?
- Find more information from the Wall Street Journal and AARP’s Public Policy Institute
Recently I’ve been working on this crazy data analysis for my professor. I say crazy because it involves 9 waves of data (different interview time points), a sample of over 22,000 Americans nearing retirement, and over 400 calculated Dow Jones scores representing changes in the stock market from 1992-2008 (That took me a better part of a week!) Our data comes largely from the Health and Retirement Study (HRS), a nationally representative, longitudinal data set that looks at people over 50 and follows them through the end of their working lives and into retirement.
This all started with an idea about the lasting effects of the 2008 stock market crash. All else being equal, whether you were interviewed by the HRS in March or December should have no bearing on your retirement plans. Unless, of course, historical time and place played a role in your decisions. By December you may have been listening to the news, watching your stocks drop, and talking to your spouse about an unanticipated future. Did the changes in 2008 influence people’s plans for retirement? Preliminary results indicate, Yes. Many people who were planning on working till 62 or 65 are now planning to work longer or are no longer sure when they can expect to retire.
So we’ve taken it a step further (enter my hundreds of stock calculations) to examine stock market fluctuations from 1992 to 2008 and see whether or not economic conditions at the time people are interviewed have any effect on individuals’ plans for retirement. I mean sure, people may be thinking and worrying about it but have they really changed their plans? The answers are yet to come!